It seems my literary idol has created a brouhaha on the internet by slamming Attachment Parenting (AP) in a Wall Street Journal essay. She claims that AP imprisons motherhood and is creating a backlash to the feminist movement for which her generation of women passionately though.
My first thought when reading her article -- the things Jong complains about modern mothers doing are not that hard. Take for example, her issue with making your own baby food. MacDad and I made our own baby food. My reasoning was that I wouldn't want to eat my meals out of a jar, so why should he. Also, we make ourselves dinner almost every night, so steaming some peas and blending them is not so much more work compared to the rest of the meal.
Is making your own baby food such a big deal and something to feel angry about? That's just silly. Same goes for her issues with breastfeeding and reusable diapers. If you use formula and disposable diapers (which I do), fine. If you choose to take the AP approach, that's great too. These activities should be encouraged. It's hard to argue that they're not better for the baby and the environment. However you raise your child, ultimately, it's your choice. That, from my impression, is the point that Jong and her feminist compatriots were fighting for. And, therein lies the difference between her generation and mine.
I get the feeling that Jong didn't necessarily choose motherhood. Having children was the way of life when she was an adult. It was assumed that being a mother was the course your life would take. Now, though, I think that women consider their options more thoroughly. Even though I'm a parent, MacDad and I thought through our decision and intentionally created a family. I don't view AP, or parenting in general as a chore (for the most part), but as a privilege. I'm happy to spend time with my son and to provide for him to the best of my ability, whether it be emotionally, physically or financially.
So, Erica Jong, you have let me down. I do not feel as though I have given up my life for my child, I feel as though he has enriched it.
1 comments:
I read the Wall Street Journal essay and it seemed to me like Jong is a)taking the short view and b)misinterpreting AP. Parenting is HARD whether you wash poopy diapers or not, breastfeed or don't. As you say Macmama, these things are undeniably better for babies and the environment but, yeah, we live in the real world and we end up compromising. Really, AP does make the first few years more intensive (my 16 month old girl still doesn't sleep through the night, still breastfeeds voraciously though I'd really like to wean soonish). But hopefully you get back what you put in with an emotionally secure young person who wants to be independent. Hopefully! If not, well, I've lost nothing except my time, which my daughter is welcome to anyway.
It seems like Jong is clinging to an outmoded idea of the function of feminism with a bias toward corporate culture. The hallowed 'Work place' treats working mothers pretty shabbily (FMLA leave is woefully inadequate, women only earn 78 cents for men's 100 cents to give just 2 examples). When you take the cost of childcare into account it's unsuprising to me that many women I know are choosing to stay home or working part time rather than being wage slaves to run a second car and pay for child and health care.
Thant isn't anti-feminist to me, I think it's wonderful. I'm really inspired right now by the book 'Radical Homemakers'. Men and women raising families and living frugally and living rich lives.
Post a Comment